Isma'ili in the context of "Imamate in Zaydi doctrine"


Isma'ili in the context of "Imamate in Zaydi doctrine"

Isma'ili Study page number 1 of 1

Answer the Isma'ili Trivia Question!

or

Skip to study material about Isma'ili in the context of "Imamate in Zaydi doctrine"


⭐ Core Definition: Isma'ili

Ismailism, known historically and among practitioners as Esotericism, is a branch of Shia Islam. Like all Shia, the Ismailis emphasize a distinction between the exoteric (zahir) and esoteric (batin) dimension of Islam, and hold that the esoteric meaning was preserved from corruption by a line of descendants of Muhammad (imams). However, unlike other Shia, the Ismaili are characterized by a unique emphasis on the esoteric that approaches antinomianism.

The Isma'ili (/ˌɪzmɑːˈɪl/) get their name from their acceptance of Imam Isma'il ibn Jafar as the appointed spiritual successor (imām) to Ja'far al-Sadiq, wherein they differ from the Twelver Shia, who accept Musa al-Kazim, the younger brother of Isma'il, as the true Imām.

↓ Menu
HINT:

👉 Isma'ili in the context of Imamate in Zaydi doctrine

In Zaydi Islam, the imamate (Arabic: إمامة, romanizedimama) is the supreme political and religious leadership position. In common with other Shi'a sects, it is reserved for Alids—i.e., descendants of Muhammad via Ali ibn Abi Talib and Fatimah. Unlike the Twelver or Isma'ili imamate, however, it was not hereditary and could be claimed by any qualified Alid; nor were its holders ascribed semi-divine attributes of infallibility and miracle-working. Necessary qualifications were a grounding in Islamic jurisprudence and a public call to allegiance, usually in the form of leadership of an uprising against unlawful authority. In practice, this meant there could be several Zaydi imams at the same time, even in the same region, or none at all. This resulted in the unique concept of a 'restricted' imamate for holders of political power who did not meet the scholarly credentials. Moreover, the personal nature of the imamate for a long time prevented the rise of persistent institutions, rendering the Zaydi states established in Yemen and Tabaristan unstable. As a result, the imamate often came to be passed down in hereditary fashion, especially as the Imams of Yemen abandoned Zaydi doctrines for Sunni ones in the 18th century.

↓ Explore More Topics
In this Dossier