C. H. Waddington in the context of Canalisation (genetics)


C. H. Waddington in the context of Canalisation (genetics)

⭐ Core Definition: C. H. Waddington

Conrad Hal Waddington CBE FRS FRSE (8 November 1905 – 26 September 1975) was a British developmental biologist, paleontologist, geneticist, embryologist and philosopher who laid the foundations for systems biology, epigenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology.

His theory of genetic assimilation probably has a Darwinian explanation, which contrast with the fact that Waddington himself was very critic about the notion of natural selection and Neo-Darwinism. Leading evolutionary biologists including Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr considered that Waddington was using genetic assimilation to support so-called Lamarckian inheritance, the acquisition of inherited characteristics through the effects of the environment during an organism's lifetime.

↓ Menu
HINT:

👉 C. H. Waddington in the context of Canalisation (genetics)

Canalisation is a measure of the ability of a population to produce the same phenotype regardless of variability of its environment or genotype. It is a form of evolutionary robustness. The term was coined in 1942 by C. H. Waddington to capture the fact that "developmental reactions, as they occur in organisms submitted to natural selection...are adjusted so as to bring about one definite end-result regardless of minor variations in conditions during the course of the reaction". He used this word rather than robustness to consider that biological systems are not robust in quite the same way as, for example, engineered systems.

Biological robustness or canalisation comes about when developmental pathways are shaped by evolution. Waddington introduced the concept of the epigenetic landscape, in which the state of an organism rolls "downhill" during development. In this metaphor, a canalised trait is illustrated as a valley (which he called a creode) enclosed by high ridges, safely guiding the phenotype to its "fate". Waddington claimed that canals form in the epigenetic landscape during evolution, and that this heuristic is useful for understanding the unique qualities of biological robustness.

↓ Explore More Topics
In this Dossier

C. H. Waddington in the context of Baldwin effect

In evolutionary biology, what is now called the Baldwin effect describes the ways agency, imitation and learned behaviour can pioneer evolutionary change. It was first christened as such in the 1950s by George Gaylord Simpson, one of the architects of the modern synthesis, to bring attention to a process highlighted in the previous century by James Mark Baldwin.

Inspired to challenge late Victorian neo-darwinism by Darwin's own use of his theory of natural selection (in On the Origin of Species) to reframe the laws of use and disuse in terms of transitional habits—giving several examples of the ways different organisms' change of habits, as in flying squirrels and flightless beetles, have altered their anatomies' subsequent evolutionary fates—Baldwin and others re-emphasised that an organism's ability to learn new behaviours (e.g., to colonise new habitat or acclimatise to a new stressor) may affect its reproductive success and may, therefore, subsequently affect the genetic makeup of its species through natural selection, if supported by heritable traits. The Baldwin effect posits that, if such new habits prove advantageous, subsequent selection will reinforce those habits and any other structures they affect so that they will become instinctive or in-born over many generations. This process may appear similar to non-Darwinian Lamarckism, a view which proposes that living things may directly inherit their parents' acquired characteristics. But, in contrast to Lamarck, and echoing Darwin's argument about transitional habits in On the Origin of Species, Baldwin proposed that, only if supportable by heritable traits, can changed behaviour lead to adaptive evolutionary change.

View the full Wikipedia page for Baldwin effect
↑ Return to Menu

C. H. Waddington in the context of International Biological Program

The International Biological Program (IBP) was an effort between 1964 and 1974 to coordinate large-scale ecological and environmental studies. Organized in the wake of the successful International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957–1958, the International Biological Program was an attempt to apply the methods of big science to ecosystem ecology and pressing environmental issues.

The IBP was organized under the leadership of C. H. Waddington beginning in 1962 and officially started in 1964, with the goal of exploring "The Biological Basis of Productivity and Human Welfare". In its early years, Canadian and European ecologists were the main participants; by 1968, the United States also became heavily involved. However, unlike other more successful applications of the big science model of scientific research, the IBP lacked a clear, socially and scientifically pressing goal. Many biologists, particularly molecular biologists and evolutionary ecologists, were sharply critical of the IBP, which they viewed as throwing money at ill-defined or relatively unimportant problems and reducing the freedom of scientists to choose their own research projects.

View the full Wikipedia page for International Biological Program
↑ Return to Menu

C. H. Waddington in the context of Genetic assimilation

Genetic assimilation is a process described by Conrad H. Waddington by which a phenotype originally produced in response to an environmental condition, such as exposure to a teratogen, later becomes genetically encoded via artificial selection or natural selection. Despite superficial appearances, this does not require the (Lamarckian) inheritance of acquired characters, although epigenetic inheritance could potentially influence the result. Waddington stated that genetic assimilation overcomes the barrier to selection imposed by what he called canalization of developmental pathways; he supposed that the organism's genetics evolved to ensure that development proceeded in a certain way regardless of normal environmental variations.

The classic example of genetic assimilation was a pair of experiments in 1942 and 1953 by Waddington. He exposed Drosophila fruit fly embryos to ether, producing an extreme change in their phenotype: they developed a double thorax, resembling the effect of the bithorax gene. This is called a homeotic change. Flies which developed halteres (the modified hindwings of true flies, used for balance) with wing-like characteristics were chosen for breeding for 20 generations, by which point the phenotype could be seen without other treatment.

View the full Wikipedia page for Genetic assimilation
↑ Return to Menu