Opt-out (politics) in the context of "Opt-outs in the European Union"

⭐ In the context of Opt-outs in the European Union, what fundamentally differentiates a negotiated opt-out from mechanisms like enhanced cooperation or temporary derogations?




⭐ Core Definition: Opt-out (politics)

In politics, an opt-out is when one level of government can decline or refuse to be part of a program designed by another, usually higher, level of government.

The term is used in both Canada and the European Union, where it has roughly the same meaning. In both cases it refers to lower levels of government choosing not to participate in a program implemented by a higher level.

↓ Menu

👉 Opt-out (politics) in the context of Opt-outs in the European Union

In general, the law of the European Union is valid in all of the twenty-seven European Union member states. However, occasionally member states negotiate certain opt-outs from legislation or treaties of the European Union, meaning they do not have to participate in certain policy areas. Currently, three states have such opt-outs: Denmark (two opt-outs), Ireland (two opt-outs) and Poland (one opt-out). The United Kingdom had four opt-outs before leaving the Union.

This is distinct from the enhanced cooperation, a measure introduced in the Treaty of Amsterdam, whereby a minimum of nine member states are allowed to co-operate within the structure of the European Union without involving other member states, after the European Commission and a qualified majority have approved the measure. It is further distinct from the Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification, whose lifting is conditional on the relevant member states meeting certain benchmarks, and temporary derogations from certain areas of cooperation (such as the Schengen Agreement and the eurozone) until the relevant member states satisfy the entry conditions.

↓ Explore More Topics
In this Dossier