Militarisation of police in the context of "Law and order (politics)"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Militarisation of police in the context of "Law and order (politics)"

Ad spacer

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<

👉 Militarisation of police in the context of Law and order (politics)

In modern politics, "law and order" is an approach focusing on harsher enforcement and penalties as ways to reduce crime. Penalties for perpetrators of disorder may include longer terms of imprisonment, mandatory sentencing, three-strikes laws and even capital punishment in some countries. Many who support the "Law and Order" movement would see harsh punishment as a deterrent for crime. Opponents of the "law and order" movement make the argument that harsh punishment is unsuccessful in deterring crime and does not address underlying or systemic causes of crime. They furthermore credit it with facilitating greater militarisation of police and contributing to mass incarceration in the United States.

Despite the widespread popularity of "law and order" ideas and approaches between the 1960s to the 1980s exemplified by presidential candidates including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan running successfully on a "tough-on-crime" platform, statistics on crime showed a significant increase of crime throughout the 1970s and 1980s instead, and crime rates only began declining from the 1990s onwards. To differing extents, crime has also been a prominent issue in Canadian, British, Australian, South African, French, German, and New Zealand politics.

↓ Explore More Topics
In this Dossier