Ergative-absolutive in the context of "Accusative case"

Play Trivia Questions online!

 or

Skip to study material about Ergative-absolutive in the context of "Accusative case"
Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: Ergative-absolutive

In linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the subject of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the subject of a transitive verb. Examples include Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, Sumerian, and certain Indo-European languages (such as Pashto and the Kurdish languages and many Indo-Aryan languages like Hindustani). It has also been attributed to the Semitic modern Aramaic (also called Neo-Aramaic) languages. Ergative languages are classified into two groups: those that are morphologically ergative but syntactically behave as accusative (for instance, Basque, Pashto and Urdu) and those that, on top of being ergative morphologically, also show ergativity in syntax. Languages that belong to the former group are more numerous than those to the latter.

The ergative-absolutive alignment is in contrast to nominative–accusative alignment, which is observed in English and most other Indo-European languages, where the single argument of an intransitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She walks") behaves grammatically like the agent (subject) of a transitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She finds it") but different from the object of a transitive verb ("her" in the sentence "He likes her"). When ergative–absolutive alignment is coded by grammatical case, the case used for the single argument of an intransitive verb and the object of a transitive verb is the absolutive, and the case used for the agent of a transitive verb is the ergative. In nominative-accusative languages, the case for the single argument of an intransitive verb and the agent of a transitive verb is the nominative, while the case for the direct object of a transitive verb is the accusative.

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<
In this Dossier

Ergative-absolutive in the context of Object (grammar)

In linguistics, an object is any of several types of arguments. In subject-prominent, nominative-accusative languages such as English, a transitive verb typically distinguishes between its subject and any of its objects, which can include but are not limited to direct objects, indirect objects, and arguments of adpositions (prepositions or postpositions); the latter are more accurately termed oblique arguments, thus including other arguments not covered by core grammatical roles, such as those governed by case morphology (as in languages such as Latin) or relational nouns (as is typical for members of the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area).In ergative-absolutive languages, for example most Australian Aboriginal languages, the term "subject" is ambiguous, and thus the term "agent" is often used instead to contrast with "object", such that basic word order is described as agent–object–verb (AOV) instead of subject–object–verb (SOV). Topic-prominent languages, such as Mandarin, focus their grammars less on the subject-object or agent-object dichotomies but rather on the pragmatic dichotomy of topic and comment.

↑ Return to Menu
LINKED FROM (PARENTS)
← Object (grammar) ← Indirect object
LINKS TO (CHILDREN)
Linguistic typology → Morphosyntactic alignment → Subject (grammar) → Intransitive verb → Object (grammar) → Transitive verb → Basque language → Georgian language → Mayan languages → Standard Tibetan → Sumerian language → Indo-European languages → Pashto → Kurdish languages → Indo-Aryan languages → Hindustani language → Semitic languages → Modern Aramaic → Nominative–accusative alignment → Urdu → English language → Argument (linguistics) → Grammatical case → Absolutive case → Ergative case → Nominative case → Accusative case →