Synchrony and diachrony in the context of "Origin of language"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Synchrony and diachrony in the context of "Origin of language"

Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: Synchrony and diachrony

Synchrony and diachrony are two complementary viewpoints in linguistic analysis. A synchronic approach – from Ancient Greek: συν- ("together") + χρόνος ("time") – considers a language at a moment in time without taking its history into account. In contrast, a diachronic – from δια- ("through, across") + χρόνος ("time") – approach, as in historical linguistics, considers the development and evolution of a language through history.

For example, a synchronic study of Middle English would focus on understanding how the language functioned at a given stage in its history. A diachronic approach, by contrast, studies language change by comparing different stages at different historical periods. The terms synchrony and diachrony are often associated with the historical linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, who considered the synchronic perspective as systematic but argued that language change is too unpredictable to be considered a system.

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<
In this Dossier

Synchrony and diachrony in the context of Syncope (phonology)

In phonology, syncope (/ˈsɪŋkəpi/; from Ancient Greek: συγκοπή, romanizedsunkopḗ, lit.'cutting up') is the loss of one or more sounds from the interior of a word, especially the loss of an unstressed vowel. It is found in both synchronic and diachronic analyses of languages. Its opposite, whereby sounds are added, is epenthesis.

↑ Return to Menu