Soup-conferences in the context of "Sarah Bernhardt"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Soup-conferences in the context of "Sarah Bernhardt"

Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: Soup-conferences

The soup conferences were a series of individualist anarchist meetings and food distributions held at the Favier hall, 13 rue de Belleville, in Paris, during the autumns and winters of the 1890s. They were conceived by Pierre Martinet in 1891 as a way to reach a poor and disadvantaged population, particularly women, the unemployed, sex workers, or criminals, and the anarchist activist Séverine quickly joined him. According to the historian Jean Maitron, they illustrate the anarchist movement’s openness to the most disadvantaged members of society. They distributed between 1,000 and 5,000 servings at each meeting.

From 1892 onwards, the soup conferences were organized by a Comité féminin, which took charge of the food management and the conferences. A notable member of this committee was Eugénie Collot. Male activists such as Jules Rousset were also involved in organizing them from this period onward. They received financial support from several artistic and intellectual figures of the time, including among others: Sarah Bernhardt, Alphonse Daudet, Émile Zola, Anatole France and Stéphane Mallarmé.

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<
In this Dossier

Soup-conferences in the context of Anarchist companionship

The anarchist companionship is the relationship system of the anarchist movement in Western Europe and a part of the world from the end of the 19th century onwards, encompassing both formal and informal anarchist networks guided by shared values such as hospitality and financial or practical aid to fellow companions. These networks also engaged in supporting other social struggles of the period—even those that were not explicitly anarchist.

This transnational network, lacking a real nerve center or central authority, allowed anarchists of the time to meet, consult, and undertake joint actions while providing them with significant mobility across Europe. The companions shared a set of structuring elements that united them: common values, a shared commitment to the anarchist struggle, and a collective imaginary, particularly shaped by the anarchist press and songs of the period.

↑ Return to Menu