Sexual selection in flowering plants in the context of Male–male competition


Sexual selection in flowering plants in the context of Male–male competition

⭐ Core Definition: Sexual selection in flowering plants

Sexual selection is a mechanism of evolution in which members of one sex choose mates of the other sex to mate with (inter-sexual selection), and compete with members of the same sex for access to members of the opposite sex (intra-sexual selection). It is an accepted concept in animal evolution, but it is more controversial in botany. Sexual selection in plants could work through two principal mechanisms:

  • Intra-sexual (male–male) competition: Competing pollen donors vie for ovule fertilization via traits such as pollen packaging, timing of release, and flower morphology.
  • Female or pistil-mediated mate choice: Post-pollination filters—such as pollen-recipient compatibility, pollen-tube growth rates, and selective seed abortion — enable differential siring success.

These two mechanisms are, in theory, the main driving forces of sexual selection in flowering plants and their potential relevance to botany is clear, but more complicated than in zoology. The complexity of applying the concept of sexual selection to plants arises from the facts that most plants are hermaphrodites and are non-sentient, meaning that the more obvious elements of female choice (e.g. aesthetic judgements on male secondary sexual characteristics) do not apply. The research challenge currently facing botanists is mainly an empirical one — it involves addressing in a comprehensive way the "empirical question of how often these processes have actually shaped plant evolution in important ways."

↓ Menu
HINT:

In this Dossier

Sexual selection in flowering plants in the context of Sexual selection

Sexual selection is a mechanism of evolution in which members of one sex choose mates of the other sex to mate with (intersexual selection), and compete with members of the same sex for access to members of the opposite sex (intrasexual selection). These two forms of selection mean that some individuals have greater reproductive success than others within a population, for example because they are more attractive or prefer more attractive partners to produce offspring. Successful males benefit from frequent mating and monopolizing access to one or more fertile females. Females can maximise the return on the energy they invest in reproduction by selecting and mating with the best males.

The concept was first articulated by Charles Darwin who wrote of a "second agency" other than natural selection, in which competition between mate candidates could lead to speciation. The theory was given a mathematical basis by Ronald Fisher in the early 20th century. Sexual selection can lead males to extreme efforts to demonstrate their fitness to be chosen by females, producing sexual dimorphism in secondary sexual characteristics, such as the ornate plumage of birds-of-paradise and peafowl, or the antlers of deer. Depending on the species, these rules can be reversed. This is caused by a positive feedback mechanism known as a Fisherian runaway, where the passing-on of the desire for a trait in one sex is as important as having the trait in the other sex in producing the runaway effect. Although the sexy son hypothesis indicates that females would prefer male offspring, Fisher's principle explains why the sex ratio is most often 1:1. Sexual selection is widely distributed in the animal kingdom, and is also found in plants and fungi.

View the full Wikipedia page for Sexual selection
↑ Return to Menu