Rob Grootendorst in the context of "Schiedam"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Rob Grootendorst in the context of "Schiedam"

Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: Rob Grootendorst

Rob Grootendorst (11 February 1944 in Schiedam – 23 February 2000 in Amsterdam) was a Dutch communication and argumentation theory scholar. He was professor for Dutch speech communication at the University of Amsterdam. His contributions to the argumentation field include the co-foundation of the pragma-dialectic school in argumentation theory.

He also wrote several books on the life and works of the Dutch writer and politician Theo Thijssen.

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<
In this Dossier

Rob Grootendorst in the context of Frans H. van Eemeren

Frans Hendrik van Eemeren (born 7 April 1946, Helmond) is a Dutch scholar, professor in the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the University of Amsterdam. He is noted for his Pragma-dialectics theory, an argumentation theory which he developed with Rob Grootendorst from the early 1980s onwards. He has published numerous books and papers, including Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse.

↑ Return to Menu

Rob Grootendorst in the context of Pragma-dialectics

Pragma-dialectics (also known as the pragma-dialectical theory) is a program in argumentation theory developed since the late 1970s by Dutch scholars Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst at the University of Amsterdam. It conceives argumentation as a form of goal-directed communicative activity aimed at the reasonable resolution of differences of opinion by means of a critical discussion. Combining a pragmatic interest in how argumentative discourse is actually used with a dialectical interest in how it ought to proceed, pragma-dialectics studies argumentation as a complex speech act that occurs in natural language use and serves specific communicative purposes.

The theory is both descriptive and normative. It offers tools for reconstructing ordinary argumentative exchanges in terms of an ideal model of a critical discussion and uses that model to evaluate whether a discourse contributes to resolving a disagreement in a reasonable way. Central to pragma-dialectics is a four-stage model of critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation and concluding) and a set of ten discussion rules that parties should observe; systematic violations of these rules are treated as fallacies. The approach integrates insights from critical rationalism, formal dialectics, speech act theory, Gricean language philosophy and discourse analysis, operationalized through meta-theoretical principles such as functionalization, socialization, externalization and dialectification.

↑ Return to Menu