Puna de Atacama dispute in the context of Salar de Atacama


Puna de Atacama dispute in the context of Salar de Atacama

⭐ Core Definition: Puna de Atacama dispute

The Puna de Atacama dispute, sometimes referred to as Puna de Atacama Lawsuit (Spanish: Litigio de la Puna de Atacama), was a border dispute involving Argentina, Chile and Bolivia in the 19th century over the arid high plateau of Puna de Atacama located about 4500 meters above the sea around the current borders of the three countries.

The dispute originated with the Chilean annexation of the Bolivian Litoral Department in 1879 during the War of the Pacific. That year, the Chilean Army occupied San Pedro de Atacama, the main settlement of the current Chilean part of Puna de Atacama. By 1884, Bolivia and its ally Peru had lost the war, and Argentina communicated to the Chilean government that the border line in the Puna was still a pending issue between Argentina and Bolivia. Chile answered that the Puna de Atacama still belonged to Bolivia. The same year, Argentina occupied Pastos Grandes in the Puna.

↓ Menu
HINT:

In this Dossier

Puna de Atacama dispute in the context of Atacama Desert border dispute

The Atacama Desert border dispute was a dispute between Bolivia and Chile from 1825 to 1879 for the territories of the Atacama coast due to the different views in the countries over what territory they inherited from the Spanish Empire. Treaties were signed to settle the border in 1866 and 1874. The dispute occurred prior to the War of the Pacific, which resolved it in favor of Chile. The surrender of land by Bolivia led to the Puna de Atacama dispute between Chile and Argentina, which was settled in 1899.

View the full Wikipedia page for Atacama Desert border dispute
↑ Return to Menu