The question of whether the governance of the European Union (EU) lacks democratic legitimacy has been debated since the time of the European Economic Community in the late 1970s. This led in part to an elected European Parliament being created in 1979 and given the power to approve or reject EU legislation. Since then, usage of the term has broadened to describe newer issues facing the European Union. Voter turnout at the elections to the European Parliament fell consecutively at every election from the first in 1979 up to 2014 when it hit a low of 42.54%, before finally rising in 2019. The 2014 turnout figure is lower than that of any national election in the 27 countries of the European Union, where turnout at national elections averages 68% across the EU.
Opinions differ as to whether the EU has a democratic deficit or how it should be remedied if it exists. Some scholars argue that the EU does not suffer from a democratic deficit as it is more constrained by its plural structure of checks and balances than any national polity. Moravcsik (2002) argues that the EU has legitimacy through its member states, as their democratically elected governments take part in EU decision-making through the Council of the European Union . He argues that the EU is an intergovernmental institutional framework where democratically elected national governments bargain with each other, and is contained by a structure of checks and balances rather than any polity. In his later work, Moravscik (2008) described the "myth" of Europes democratic deficit, believing that the EU functions as an interstate organisation, which is held accountable member state governments rather than citizens. This makes direct democratic accountability to EU-level electorates less important
