Democratic deficit in the context of Democracy


Democratic deficit in the context of Democracy

Democratic deficit Study page number 1 of 1

Play TriviaQuestions Online!

or

Skip to study material about Democratic deficit in the context of "Democracy"


⭐ Core Definition: Democratic deficit

A democratic deficit (or democracy deficit) occurs when ostensibly-democratic organizations or institutions (particularly governments) fall short of fulfilling the principles of democracy in their practices or operation. Representative and linked parliamentary integrity have become widely discussed. The qualitative expression of the democratic deficit is the difference between the democracy indices of a country from the highest possible values.

The phrase "democratic deficit" is cited as first being used by the Young European Federalists in their Manifesto in 1977, which was drafted by Richard Corbett.It was also used by David Marquand in 1979, referring to the European Economic Community, the forerunner of the European Union.

↓ Menu
HINT:

In this Dossier

Democratic deficit in the context of Popular assembly

A popular assembly (or people's assembly) is a gathering called to address issues of importance to participants. Popular assemblies tend to be freely open to participation, in contrast to elected assemblies and randomly-selected citizens' assemblies, and are a form of direct democracy. Some popular assemblies consist of people invited from a location, while others invite them from a workplace, industry, educational establishment or protest movement. Some are called to address a specific issue, while others have a wider scope.

The term is often used to describe gatherings that address, what participants feel are, the effects of a democratic deficit in representative democratic systems. Sometimes assemblies are created to form an alternative power structure, other times they work with other forms of government.

View the full Wikipedia page for Popular assembly
↑ Return to Menu

Democratic deficit in the context of Democratic deficit in the European Union

The question of whether the governance of the European Union (EU) lacks democratic legitimacy has been debated since the time of the European Economic Community in the late 1970s. This led in part to an elected European Parliament being created in 1979 and given the power to approve or reject EU legislation. Since then, usage of the term has broadened to describe newer issues facing the European Union. Voter turnout at the elections to the European Parliament fell consecutively at every election from the first in 1979 up to 2014 when it hit a low of 42.54%, before finally rising in 2019. The 2014 turnout figure is lower than that of any national election in the 27 countries of the European Union, where turnout at national elections averages 68% across the EU.

Opinions differ as to whether the EU has a democratic deficit or how it should be remedied if it exists. Some scholars argue that the EU does not suffer from a democratic deficit as it is more constrained by its plural structure of checks and balances than any national polity. Moravcsik (2002) argues that the EU has legitimacy through its member states, as their democratically elected governments take part in EU decision-making through the Council of the European Union . He argues that the EU is an intergovernmental institutional framework where democratically elected national governments bargain with each other, and is contained by a structure of checks and balances rather than any polity. In his later work, Moravscik (2008) described the "myth" of Europes democratic deficit, believing that the EU functions as an interstate organisation, which is held accountable member state governments rather than citizens. This makes direct democratic accountability to EU-level electorates less important

View the full Wikipedia page for Democratic deficit in the European Union
↑ Return to Menu