Deferent and epicycle in the context of "Apparent retrograde motion"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Deferent and epicycle in the context of "Apparent retrograde motion"

Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: Deferent and epicycle

In the Hipparchian, Ptolemaic, and Copernican systems of astronomy, the epicycle (from Ancient Greek ἐπίκυκλος (epíkuklos) 'upon the circle', meaning "circle moving on another circle") was a geometric model used to explain the variations in speed and direction of the apparent motion of the Moon, Sun, and planets. In particular it explained the apparent retrograde motion of the five planets known at the time. Secondarily, it also explained changes in the apparent distances of the planets from the Earth.

It was first proposed by Apollonius of Perga at the end of the 3rd century BC. It was developed by Apollonius of Perga and Hipparchus of Rhodes, who used it extensively, during the 2nd century BC, then formalized and extensively used by Ptolemy in his 2nd century AD astronomical treatise the Almagest.

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<
In this Dossier

Deferent and epicycle in the context of Copernican heliocentrism

Copernican heliocentrism is the astronomical model developed by Nicolaus Copernicus and published in 1543. This model positioned the Sun near the center of the Universe, motionless, with Earth and the other planets orbiting around it in circular paths, modified by epicycles, and at uniform speeds. The Copernican model challenged the geocentric model of Ptolemy that had prevailed for centuries, which had placed Earth at the center of the Universe.

Although Copernicus had circulated an outline of his own theory to colleagues sometime before 1514, he did not decide to publish it until he was urged to do so later by his pupil Rheticus. His model was an alternative to the longstanding Ptolemaic model that purged astronomy of the equant in order to satisfy the theological and philosophical ideal that all celestial motion must be perfect and uniform, preserving the metaphysical implications of a mathematically ordered cosmos. His heliostatic model retained several false Ptolemaic assumptions such as the planets' circular orbits, epicycles, and uniform speeds, while at the same time using accurate ideas such as:

↑ Return to Menu