De jure belli ac pacis in the context of Jus gentium
De jure belli ac pacis in the context of Jus gentium
⭐ Core Definition: De jure belli ac pacis
De iure belli ac pacis (English: On the Law of War and Peace) is a 1625 work by Dutch jurist and philosopher Hugo Grotius, which is widely regarded as a foundational text in the development of international law. First published in Paris, the work sets out to establish a legal framework for war and peace based on natural law, reason, and customary norms among nations (jus gentium).
Several editions of the work appeared during Grotius’s lifetime; the final, published in Amsterdam in 1642, is widely regarded by scholars as the version most faithful to his authorial intentions, reflecting his mature legal and philosophical views.
De jure belli ac pacis in the context of Hugo Grotius
Hugo Grotius (/ˈɡroʊʃiəs/GROH-shee-əss; 10 April 1583 – 28 August 1645), also known as Hugo de Groot (Dutch:[ˈɦyɣoːdəˈɣroːt]) or Huig de Groot (Dutch:[ˈɦœyɣdəˈɣroːt]), was a Dutchhumanist, diplomat, lawyer, theologian, jurist, statesman, poet and playwright. A teenage prodigy, he was born in Delft and studied at Leiden University. He was imprisoned in Loevestein Castle for his involvement in the controversies over religious policy of the Dutch Republic, but escaped hidden in a chest of books that was regularly brought to him and was transported to Gorinchem. Grotius wrote most of his major works in exile in France.
Grotius was a major figure in the fields of philosophy, political theory and law during the 16th and 17th centuries. Along with the earlier works of Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili, his writings laid the foundations for international law. Two of his books have had a lasting impact in the field: De jure belli ac pacis (On the Law of War and Peace) dedicated to Louis XIII of France and the Mare Liberum (The Free Seas) for which Grotius has been called the "father of international law." Grotius has also contributed significantly to the evolution of the notion of rights. Before him, rights were, above all, perceived as attached to objects; after him, they are seen as belonging to persons, as the expression of an ability to act, or as a means of realizing something.
