Contract theory in the context of Expected utility theory


Contract theory in the context of Expected utility theory

Contract theory Study page number 1 of 1

Play TriviaQuestions Online!

or

Skip to study material about Contract theory in the context of "Expected utility theory"


⭐ Core Definition: Contract theory

From an economic perspective, contract theory studies how economic actors can and do construct contractual arrangements, generally in the presence of information asymmetry. Because of its connections with both agency and incentives, contract theory is often categorized within a field known as law and economics. One prominent application of it is the design of optimal schemes of managerial compensation. In the field of economics, the first formal treatment of this topic was given by Kenneth Arrow in the 1960s. In 2016, Oliver Hart and Bengt R. Holmström both received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for their work on contract theory, covering many topics from CEO pay to privatizations. Holmström focused more on the connection between incentives and risk, while Hart on the unpredictability of the future that creates holes in contracts.

A standard practice in the microeconomics of contract theory is to represent the behaviour of a decision maker under certain numerical utility structures, and then apply an optimization algorithm to identify optimal decisions. Such a procedure has been used in the contract theory framework to several typical situations, labeled moral hazard, adverse selection and signalling. The spirit of these models lies in finding theoretical ways to motivate agents to take appropriate actions, even under an insurance contract. The main results achieved through this family of models involve: mathematical properties of the utility structure of the principal and the agent, relaxation of assumptions, and variations of the time structure of the contract relationship, among others. It is customary to model people as maximizers of some von Neumann–Morgenstern utility functions, as stated by expected utility theory.

↓ Menu
HINT:

In this Dossier

Contract theory in the context of Information asymmetry

In contract theory, mechanism design, and economics, an information asymmetry is a situation where one party has more or better information than the other.

Information asymmetry creates an imbalance of power in transactions, which can sometimes cause the transactions to be inefficient, causing market failure in the worst case. Examples of this problem are adverse selection, moral hazard, and monopolies of knowledge.

View the full Wikipedia page for Information asymmetry
↑ Return to Menu

Contract theory in the context of Signalling (economics)

Signalling (or signaling; see spelling differences) in contract theory is the idea that one party (the agent) credibly conveys some information about itself to another party (the principal).Signalling was briefly introduced and discussed in the seminal Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, which is considered to be the text that created the research field of game theory.

Signaling theory was more fully developed by Michael Spence, specifically in the context of observed knowledge gaps between organisations and prospective employees. However, its intuitive nature led it to be adapted to many other domains, such as Human Resource Management, business, and financial markets.

View the full Wikipedia page for Signalling (economics)
↑ Return to Menu