Condorcet criterion in the context of "Marquis de Condorcet"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about Condorcet criterion in the context of "Marquis de Condorcet"




⭐ Core Definition: Condorcet criterion

A Condorcet winner (French: [kɔ̃dɔʁsɛ], English: /kɒndɔːrˈs/) is a candidate who would receive the support of more than half of the electorate in a one-on-one race against any one of their opponents. Voting systems where a majority winner will always win are said to satisfy the Condorcet winner criterion. The Condorcet winner criterion extends the principle of majority rule to elections with multiple candidates.

Named after Nicolas de Condorcet, it is also called a majority winner, a majority-preferred candidate, a beats-all winner, or tournament winner (by analogy with round-robin tournaments). A Condorcet winner may not necessarily always exist in a given electorate: it is possible to have a rock paper scissors-style cycle, when multiple candidates defeat each other (rock < paper < scissors < rock). This is called Condorcet's voting paradox, and is analogous to the counterintuitive intransitive dice phenomenon known in probability. However, the Smith set, a generalization of the Condorcet criteria that is the smallest set of candidates that are pairwise unbeaten by every candidate outside of it, will always exist.

↓ Menu

In this Dossier

Condorcet criterion in the context of Median voter

In political science and social choice, Black's median voter theorem says that if voters and candidates are distributed along a political spectrum, any Condorcet consistent voting method will elect the candidate preferred by the median voter. The median voter theorem thus shows that under a realistic model of voter behavior, Arrow's theorem does not apply, and rational choice is possible for societies. The theorem was first derived by Duncan Black in 1948, and independently by Kenneth Arrow.

Similar median voter theorems exist for rules like score voting and approval voting when voters are either strategic and informed or if voters' ratings of candidates fall linearly with ideological distance.

↑ Return to Menu