American Journal of International Law in the context of "Law of nations"

Play Trivia Questions online!

or

Skip to study material about American Journal of International Law in the context of "Law of nations"

Ad spacer

⭐ Core Definition: American Journal of International Law

The American Journal of International Law is an English-language scholarly journal focusing on international law and international relations, published by American Society of International Law (ASIL). It has been published quarterly since 1907. The Journal primarily publishes a few research articles per issue. Additionally, it publishes summaries and analyses of decisions from national and international courts, arbitral tribunals, and other tribunals, as well as analyses of contemporary U.S. practice in international law.

The Society's history and contributions to international law are chronicled in Frederic L. Kirgis, The American Society of International Law's First Century: 1906–2006 " (Brill, 2006).

↓ Menu

>>>PUT SHARE BUTTONS HERE<<<

👉 American Journal of International Law in the context of Law of nations

International law, also known as public international law and the law of nations, is the set of rules, norms, legal customs and standards that states and other actors feel an obligation to, and generally do, obey in their mutual relations. In international relations, actors are simply the individuals and collective entities, such as states, international organizations, and non-state groups, which can make behavioral choices, whether lawful or unlawful. Rules are formal, typically written expectations that outline required behavior, while norms are informal, often unwritten guidelines about appropriate behavior that are shaped by custom and social practice. It establishes norms for states across a broad range of domains, including war and diplomacy, economic relations, and human rights.

International law differs from state-based domestic legal systems in that it operates largely through consent, since there is no universally accepted authority to enforce it upon sovereign states. States and non-state actors may choose to not abide by international law, and even to breach a treaty, but such violations, particularly of peremptory norms, can be met with disapproval by others and in some cases coercive action including diplomacy, economic sanctions, and war. The lack of a final authority in international law can also cause far reaching differences. This is partly the effect of states being able to interpret international law in a manner which they see fit. This can lead to problematic stances which can have large local effects.

↓ Explore More Topics
In this Dossier

American Journal of International Law in the context of International law

International law, also known as public international law and the law of nations, is the set of rules, norms, legal customs and standards that states and other actors feel an obligation to, and generally do, obey in their mutual relations. In international relations, actors are simply the individuals and collective entities, such as states, international organizations, and non-state groups, which can make behavioral choices, whether lawful or unlawful. Rules are formal, typically written expectations that outline required behavior, while norms are informal, often unwritten guidelines about appropriate behavior that are shaped by custom and social practice. It establishes norms for states across a broad range of domains, including war and diplomacy, economic relations, and human rights.

The term public international law embraces a wide variety legal regimes governing the conduct and relationships between states, between states and international organizations, and between entities and persons both natural and legal. Public international law defines the criteria for statehood, and legal theorists argue that it establishes states as the principal actors in the international legal system. (While the traditional view was that only states were subjects of international law, with the founding of the United Nations, that view expanded to include intergovernmental organizations. Contemporary conceptions of international law are much broader, and include the interactions such as the ones listed at the beginning of this paragraph.) Public International law also governs the outer bounds of permissible treatment of individuals by states with comprehensive international law regimes dealing with non-combatants, including prisoners of war, civilians, and refugees, as well as human rights.

↑ Return to Menu

American Journal of International Law in the context of Eyal Benvenisti

Eyal Benvenisti (Hebrew: איל בנבנשתי; born 18 February 1959) is an attorney and legal academic, and Whewell Professor of International Law at the University of Cambridge. He was formerly Anny and Paul Yanowicz Professor of Human Rights at Tel Aviv University's faculty of law. Since 2003 he has been part of the Global Law Faculty at New York University School of Law. He is the founding co-editor of Theoretical Inquiries in Law (1997–2002), where he served as Editor in Chief (2003-2006). He has also served on the editorial boards of the American Journal of International Law, and International Law in Domestic Courts.

Benvenisti is a member of the Israeli Law Professors' Forum for Democracy, established in 2023 to respond to the Israeli government coalition's plans for changes in the legal system.

↑ Return to Menu